Hello There, Guest!
View New Posts   View Today's Posts

DON'T FORGET TO READ THE FORUM RULES (February 15, 2017)

BAGI MEMBERS YANG TIDAK MENDAPATKAN EMAIL AKTIVASI (FOR MEMBERS WHO DIDN'T GET AN EMAIL ACTIVATION) (January 24, 2018)

OFFICIAL FLAT EARTH 101 FACEBOOK GROUP!! (January 20)

Terma "millions of years" adalah KEBOHONGAN sains modern rekaan Charles Lyell

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


01-15-2018, 10:40 PM #1
yinbyungheon
Member
***
Posts: 21 Threads:13 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 1

Exclamation  Terma "millions of years" adalah KEBOHONGAN sains modern rekaan Charles Lyell
Dr. Del Tackett creator of "The Truth Project" bertanya dalam dokumentari yang  berjudul "Is genesis history". If Jesus is descended from Adam, and Adam was created on the sixth day of creation, then the Earth can't be very old. So where do the millions of years come from?

Andrew Snelling, PhD - Geologist Flagstaff, AZ menjawab:

Geological processes haven't been at constant rates through time. And we have other hints...that the, the decay rates might not have been constant. So we've taken rock samples from a number of places. Lots of samples in the Grand Canyon, in each of these rock layers. I've done it in New Zealand. We've done in other parts of the world. And what we've done is we submitted...the same samples...to more than one of these dating methods. And so, what we found is on the same samples with more than one method, we were getting ages that were different by hundreds of millions of years, even a billion years in some instances. We're seeing huge differences by using different, different methods.

Dr. Del Tackett:

Well, if, if, if there is that kind of difference between all of these dating method, methods...then that would seems to confirm the fact that we have an open system here,

Andrew Snelling, PhD - Geologist Flagstaff, AZ menjawab:

Correct. not closed one. And if we have an open system, that means, we can't trust it... to give us dependable dates...for those rocks. And that changes the whole thinking about the history of the EarthBecause suddenly now, these radioactive clocks are not reliable. Uh, we got evidence that rates were faster in the past. Suddenly, we, we might not be thinking in terms of millions of years. We might be thinking in terms of a history...that is much more much shorter.

Dr. Del Tackett bertanya kembali:

But you were saying that this kind of evidence...uh, is in the open literature now. Why, why is it not making impact?

Andrew Snelling, PhD - Geologist Flagstaff, AZ menjawab:

Yes, yes. Well, I, I, I've been asked that when I've spoken in universities'
geology departments. And the answer is: Because...there is a commitment
to the millions of years. And so, once people get lock in to that focus...anything outside their field of view that...conflicts with that focus...uh, is, is marginalized. And the reason why the millions of years are important, If, if, if we go back in history of, of scientific thoughtCharles Lyell in England...proposed millions of years and they multiplied the ages for the rocks. And that was the foundation on which Charles Darwin built. In fact, he read Charles Lyell's book... and was convinced of the millions of years of geological evolutionso he could say, now given enough time...what we now see happening in the present, we might not only see small changes in the present, given millions of yearsthe small changes can add up to big changesAnd so, if you want to have a way of looking at the hist of history...that uh, says that we got here by chance, random processes over millions of years,...then you got to have rocks that are millions of years old. Otherwise, you'd undermine that whole...that whole foundation of that view of the history.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sila ikuti dokumentari ini bermula dari minit yang ke 26:27

Download videonya di https://rarbg.to/torrent/vtyoqwg

Jadi jangan hairan terma "millions of years" sangat popular di abad 17-18 untuk memenuhi hasrat "commitment to the millions of years" sains modern. Sekiranya kita perhatikan mereka berada di era yang sama:
  • Sir Charles Lyell, 1st Baronet, FRS (14 November 1797 – 22 February 1875) He was a close friend of Charles Darwin, and contributed significantly to Darwin's thinking on the processes involved in evolution.
  • Charles Robert Darwin, FRS FRGS FLS FZS[2] (/ˈdɑːrwɪn/;[5] 12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882)  
  • Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel (German: [ˈbɛsəl]; 22 July 1784 – 17 March 1846)  The first astronomer who determined reliable values for the distance from the sun to another star by the method of parallax.
  • Thomas Henderson FRSE FRS FRAS (28 December 1798 – 23 November 1844) The first person to measure the distance to Alpha Centauri, the major component of the nearest stellar system to Earth, the first to determine the parallax of a fixed star. Henderson did not immediately publish his results, however (there had been previous, discredited attempts to claim a measurement of stellar parallax), and eventually he was beaten to the punch by Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel, who published a parallax of 10.3 light years (9.6% too small) for 61 Cygni in 1838.
  • Friedrich Georg Wilhelm von Struve (Russian: Василий Яковлевич Струве, trans. Vasily Yakovlevich Struve; 15 April 1793 – 23 November [O.S. 11 November] 1864) He was also the first to measure the parallax of Vega, although Friedrich Bessel had been the first to measure the parallax of a star (61 Cygni).
In fact, in the 1830s there was a fierce competition between astronomers to be the first to measure a stellar parallax accurately.

Sampai sekarang, kita tidak tahu siapa yang proclaimed jarak bumi dan matahari adalah 
149.6 million km. Yang ada cuma kenyataan dari NASA sahaja.




Forum Jump:



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)